Search for: "FAITH BRYAN" Results 1 - 20 of 196
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jan 2008, 3:45 pm
The move, Article VI, is the result of two years' work by director Bryan Hall who traveled the country talking with people about the topic. [read post]
25 Mar 2017, 9:14 am by Camilla Alexandra Hrdy
The jury should not be involved in deciding either willfulness by infringers or bad faith by patentees. [read post]
3 Feb 2008, 12:51 am
Article VI documents Bryan Hall's experience as he travels around the country engaging people in a discussion about faith in politics. [read post]
19 Sep 2016, 3:32 am by Peter Mahler
A hat tip to attorney William O’Bryan, Jr. of Butler Snow in Nashville, whose blog post brought the Wilford case to my attention. [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 5:28 am by Matthew David Brozik
The rest of the cease and desist letter covers the expected territory: some argument of similarity of the marks; an explanation of Bryan’s lack of rights or legitimate interest; a statement of his bad faith; a paragraph about trademark infringement; a (polite) threat of filing a Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy claim and/or federal complaint without further notice; and a demand that Bryan stop using the domain name and transfer it to the Board, stop selling any… [read post]
11 Sep 2014, 6:29 am by Andrew Koppelman
The hero is the Faithful and Impartial Judge, the servant of Democracy. [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 10:00 pm by Doug Austin
Bryan denied without prejudice the plaintiff’s Motion for Sanctions for Defendant’s Willful Spoliation of Evidence for deleting her email account after she was terminated, finding a lack of duty preserve or bad faith on the defendant’s part and minimal (if any) prejudice to the plaintiff. [read post]
15 Nov 2021, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Campaign Finance National: “The FEC Relies on Candidates’ ‘Good Faith’ When It Comes to Foreign Donations. [read post]
29 Dec 2014, 5:00 am by Matthew David Brozik
The rest of the cease and desist letter covers the expected territory: some argument of similarity of the marks; an explanation of Bryan’s lack of rights or legitimate interest; a statement of his bad faith; a paragraph about trademark infringement; a (polite) threat of filing a Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy claim and/or federal complaint without further notice; and a demand that Bryan stop using the domain name and transfer it to the Board, stop selling any… [read post]
17 Aug 2023, 11:41 am by Shawn Dominy
  Therefore, the officer in Rogers was not acting in good faith reliance on the Ohio statute. [read post]